[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170427041918.ts33j22wm352xjni@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:19:18 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: iov_iter_pipe warning.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 06:54:30PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Well it's been running an hour without incident, which looks promising.
> > I'll leave it run, but I'd say you're on the right track given how quick
> > it reproduced so far.
>
> Could you try this and see if it works? What happens is that unlike
> e.g. generic_file_read_iter/generic_file_write_iter, NFS O_DIRECT handling
> does not make sure that iov_iter had been advanced by the amount
> actually transferred - it is left advanced by the amount *requested*.
Sorry for delay on this, been sick. Just gave this a run for 12 hours.
Looks good to me.
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists