linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] staging: ks7010: fix block comment style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170428150132.0082f449@zero1>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:01:32 +0200
From:   Ilia Sergachev <ilia.sergachev@...bas.ch>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: ks7010: fix block comment style

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:20:21 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> 
> Nope, the whole thing still doesn't apply:
> 
> checking file drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_wlan_net.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 230.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 343.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 1137.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 1189.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 1225.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 1497.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 1569.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 1596.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 1970.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 2105.
> Hunk #11 FAILED at 3351.
> 11 out of 11 hunks FAILED
> 
> What tree/branch are you making this patch against?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Ok, I was using torvalds/linux instead of next/linux-next.
In fact, the style fixes on this file were already done in 'next'.
So, thank you all for your patience, and sorry about lost time,
these were the necessary lessons for me - I'll find now something else
to fix :) 

Ilia.