linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170428183617.GB7065@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:36:17 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register_divider

On 04/22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > On 04/20, Tero Kristo wrote:
> >> On 19/04/17 20:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> The failing piece of code is only executed for legacy boot mode
> >> OMAP3 right now, which could be potentially stripped out of the
> >> kernel already (I think Tony removed the support for non-DT boot
> >> OMAP3 boards already...?) This explains why I didn't notice the
> >> issue in my local testing either.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Fixes: d96f774b2538 ("clk: ti: divider: add support for legacy divider init")
> >> >Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>
> >> So, this patch itself is fine, but the desc should be updated to
> >> reflect the above somehow.
> >>
> >> And the "Fixes:" line should be updated to point to the commit
> >> mentioned above also.
> >>
> >
> > Waiting for Arnd to agree. I can also rename reg_setup to reg.
> 
> Yes, it would be great if you could update the patch description that way
> so I don't have to send a new version. Thanks,
> 

Ok. I came up with something and applied it to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project