lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:31:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     briannorris@...omium.org
Cc:     joe@...ches.com, apw@...onical.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, mingo@...hat.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't encourage new code to use
 "networking" style comments

From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:27:22 -0700

> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:24:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 10:55 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
>> I believe the only person that actually cares about
>> the networking
>> comment style is David Miller.
> 
> Which is why I've CC'd him. If even *he* doesn't care about having
> this warning in checkpatch, then why should anyone else?

Well it potentially saves one round trip for patch submissions.

What I'm not going to do is let people start using different comment
style even for new code in files like net/core/whatever.c after I've
spent nearly two decades getting them to be one way so far.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ