linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cgroup: avoid attaching a cgroup root to two different superblocks, take 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:07:20 -0400
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc:     avagin@...tuozzo.com, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: avoid attaching a cgroup root to two different
 superblocks, take 2

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:15:59AM +0800, Zefan Li wrote:
> Commit bfb0b80db5f9 is broken. Now we try to fix the race by delaying
> the initialization of cgroup root refcnt until a superblock has been
> allocated.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 3.16+
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>
> Tested-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>

Applied to cgroup/for-4.12 w/o the stable tag.  Let's wait this one
out.  It's unlikely to trigger in real use cases and if we decide that
this needs to be in -stable, we can ask Greg later.

> Again I didn't receive your reply. I believe the problem is in my side.
> I'll see if there's some network administrator who can look into this
> issue, but I don't have much hope...

Bummer.  Is there another address I can cc? :(

Thanks.

-- 
tejun