[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170429101726.cdczojcjjupb7myy@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 13:17:26 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm, zone_device: replace {get,
put}_zone_device_page() with a single reference
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 03:33:07PM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:22:24PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Are you sure about needing to hook the 2 -> 1 transition? Could we
> > change ZONE_DEVICE pages to not have an elevated reference count when
> > they are created so you can keep the HMM references out of the mm hot
> > path?
>
> 100% sure on that :) I need to callback into driver for 2->1 transition
> no way around that. If we change ZONE_DEVICE to not have an elevated
> reference count that you need to make a lot more change to mm so that
> ZONE_DEVICE is never use as fallback for memory allocation. Also need
> to make change to be sure that ZONE_DEVICE page never endup in one of
> the path that try to put them back on lru. There is a lot of place that
> would need to be updated and it would be highly intrusive and add a
> lot of special cases to other hot code path.
Could you explain more on where the requirement comes from or point me to
where I can read about this.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists