[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170430050529.GH27790@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 22:05:29 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill@...temov.name,
ak@...ux.intel.com, mhocko@...nel.org, dave@...olabs.net,
jack@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
haren@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@...il.com, bsingharora@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 05/17] RCU free VMAs
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:52:44PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> +static inline bool vma_is_dead(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned int sequence)
> +{
> + int ret = RB_EMPTY_NODE(&vma->vm_rb);
> + unsigned seq = ACCESS_ONCE(vma->vm_sequence.sequence);
> +
> + /*
> + * Matches both the wmb in write_seqlock_{begin,end}() and
> + * the wmb in vma_rb_erase().
> + */
> + smp_rmb();
> +
> + return ret || seq != sequence;
> +}
Hang on, this isn't vma_is_dead(). This is vma_has_changed() (possibly
from live to dead, but also possibly grown or shrunk; see your earlier
patch).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists