lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-88d879d29f9cc0de2d930b584285638cdada6625@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 30 Apr 2017 04:43:14 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Janakarajan Natarajan <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] Prevent timer value 0 for MWAITX

Commit-ID:  88d879d29f9cc0de2d930b584285638cdada6625
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/88d879d29f9cc0de2d930b584285638cdada6625
Author:     Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 16:44:03 -0500
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 13:35:11 +0200

Prevent timer value 0 for MWAITX

Newer hardware has uncovered a bug in the software implementation of
using MWAITX for the delay function. A value of 0 for the timer is meant
to indicate that a timeout will not be used to exit MWAITX. On newer
hardware this can result in MWAITX never returning, resulting in NMI
soft lockup messages being printed. On older hardware, some of the other
conditions under which MWAITX can exit masked this issue. The AMD APM
does not currently document this and will be updated.

Please refer to http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=148950623231140 for
information regarding NMI soft lockup messages on an AMD Ryzen 1800X.
This has been root-caused as a 0 passed to MWAITX causing it to wait
indefinitely.

This change has the added benefit of avoiding the unnecessary setup of
MONITORX/MWAITX when the delay value is zero.

Signed-off-by: Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1493156643-29366-1-git-send-email-Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

---
 arch/x86/lib/delay.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
index a8e91ae..29df077 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/delay.c
@@ -93,6 +93,13 @@ static void delay_mwaitx(unsigned long __loops)
 {
 	u64 start, end, delay, loops = __loops;
 
+	/*
+	 * Timer value of 0 causes MWAITX to wait indefinitely, unless there
+	 * is a store on the memory monitored by MONITORX.
+	 */
+	if (loops == 0)
+		return;
+
 	start = rdtsc_ordered();
 
 	for (;;) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ