[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcTptSxGnHJzosbio-8PG3ojgr2vfhL9QuUf+OgeCQWGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:31:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] iio: accel: adxl345: Setup DATA_READY trigger
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com> wrote:
> The ADXL345 provides a DATA_READY interrupt function to signal
> availability of new data. This interrupt function is latched and can be
> cleared by reading the data registers. The polarity is set to active
> high by default.
>
> Support this functionality by setting it up as an IIO trigger.
>
> In addition, two output pins INT1 and INT2 are available for driving
> interrupts. Allow mapping to either pins by specifying the
> interrupt-names property in device tree.
> -int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap,
> +int adxl345_core_probe(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap, int irq,
> const char *name);
I think I commented this once. Instead of increasing parameters,
please introduce a new struct (as separate preparatory patch) which
will hold current parameters. Let's call it
strut adxl345_chip {
struct device *dev;
struct regmap *regmap;
const char *name;
};
I insisnt in this chage.
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
Can we get rid of gnostic resource providers?
> +static const struct iio_trigger_ops adxl345_trigger_ops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
Do we still need this kind of lines?
> + .set_trigger_state = adxl345_drdy_trigger_set_state,
> +};
> static const struct iio_info adxl345_info = {
> .driver_module = THIS_MODULE,
Ditto, though it's in the current code.
> .read_raw = adxl345_read_raw,
> };
> + /*
> + * Any bits set to 0 send their respective interrupts to the INT1 pin,
> + * whereas bits set to 1 send their respective interrupts to the INT2
> + * pin. Map all interrupts to the specified pin.
> + */
> + of_irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "INT2");
So, can we get it in resourse provider agnostic way?
> + if (of_irq == irq)
> + regval = 0xFF;
> + else
> + regval = 0x00;
regval = of_irq == irq ? 0xff : 0x00; ?
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_INT_MAP, regval);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up interrupts: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists