lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170501165747.GA993@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 09:57:47 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: WARN_ON_ONCE() in process_one_work()?

Hello!

I am hitting this WARN_ON_ONCE() in process_one_work() and am wondering
what I did wrong to make this happen:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

static void process_one_work(struct worker *worker, struct work_struct *work)
__releases(&pool->lock)
__acquires(&pool->lock)
{
	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
	struct worker_pool *pool = worker->pool;
	bool cpu_intensive = pwq->wq->flags & WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE;
	int work_color;
	struct worker *collision;
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
	/*
	 * It is permissible to free the struct work_struct from
	 * inside the function that is called from it, this we need to
	 * take into account for lockdep too.  To avoid bogus "held
	 * lock freed" warnings as well as problems when looking into
	 * work->lockdep_map, make a copy and use that here.
	 */
	struct lockdep_map lockdep_map;

	lockdep_copy_map(&lockdep_map, &work->lockdep_map);
#endif
	/* ensure we're on the correct CPU */
	WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) &&
		     raw_smp_processor_id() != pool->cpu);

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the splat:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[12600.593006] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6 at /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/workqueue.c:2041 process_one_work+0x46c/0x4d0
[12600.593006] Modules linked in:
[12600.593006] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: mm_percpu_wq Not tainted 4.11.0-rc7+ #1
[12600.593006] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[12600.593006] Call Trace:
[12600.593006]  dump_stack+0x4f/0x72
[12600.593006]  __warn+0xc6/0xe0
[12600.593006]  warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x20
[12600.593006]  process_one_work+0x46c/0x4d0
[12600.593006]  rescuer_thread+0x20e/0x3b0
[12600.593006]  kthread+0x104/0x140
[12600.593006]  ? worker_thread+0x4e0/0x4e0
[12600.593006]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
[12600.593006]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This happens about 3.5 hours into the TREE03 rcutorture scenario, .config
attached.

Enlightenment?

							Thanx, Paul

View attachment ".config" of type "text/plain" (112858 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ