linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tcmu: Add dynamic growing data area featuresupport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 13:37:41 -0500
From:   Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
To:     Xiubo Li <lixiubo@...s.chinamobile.com>, nab@...ux-iscsi.org
Cc:     agrover@...hat.com, iliastsi@...ikto.com, namei.unix@...il.com,
        sheng@...ker.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jianfei Hu <hujianfei@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] tcmu: Add dynamic growing data area featuresupport

On 04/30/2017 05:22 AM, Xiubo Li wrote:
> On 2017年04月30日 13:48, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 04/26/2017 01:25 AM, lixiubo@...s.chinamobile.com wrote:
>>>       for_each_sg(data_sg, sg, data_nents, i) {
>>> @@ -275,22 +371,26 @@ static void alloc_and_scatter_data_area(struct
>>> tcmu_dev *udev,
>>>           from = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
>>>           while (sg_remaining > 0) {
>>>               if (block_remaining == 0) {
>>> -                block = find_first_zero_bit(udev->data_bitmap,
>>> -                        DATA_BLOCK_BITS);
>>>                   block_remaining = DATA_BLOCK_SIZE;
>>> -                set_bit(block, udev->data_bitmap);
>>> +                dbi = tcmu_get_empty_block(udev, &to);
>>> +                if (dbi < 0)
>>
>> I know it you fixed the missing kunmap_atomic here and missing unlock in
>> tcmu_queue_cmd_ring in the next patch, but I think normally people
>> prefer that one patch does not add a bug, then the next patch fixes it.
> Do you mean the following kmap_atomic() ?
> 
> from = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)) + sg->offset;
> 
> In this patch there has no new kmap/kunmap introduced. This is the old
> code and
> the kunmap is at the end of aasda().

You added a new return in the error path in this patch in the if case
above, but did not add a kunmap_atomic.