linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: accel: adxl345_core: Introduce set_mode and data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9C6C5B25-76A9-48CE-841D-5D9FC92A8FDA@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Date:   Mon, 01 May 2017 20:48:15 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...23.retrosnub.co.uk>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
CC:     Eva Rachel Retuya <eraretuya@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>,
        Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>,
        Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] iio: accel: adxl345_core: Introduce set_mode and data_ready functions



On 1 May 2017 20:42:08 BST, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
>wrote:
>> On 29/04/17 08:48, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
>
>>> +static int adxl345_set_mode(struct adxl345_data *data, u8 mode)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(data->regmap);
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +
>>> +     ret = regmap_write(data->regmap, ADXL345_REG_POWER_CTL, mode);
>>> +     if (ret < 0) {
>>> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to set power mode, %d\n", ret);
>>> +             return ret;
>> drop the return ret here and just return ret at the end of the
>function.
>> One of the static checkers will probably moan about this otherwise.
>
>But this will be not equivalent!
Why? Regmap_write returns 0 for success.
>
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>> +     return 0;
>>> +}

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.