[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170501212631.995489048@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:31:12 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 05/54] net: neigh: guard against NULL solicit() method
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 48481c8fa16410ffa45939b13b6c53c2ca609e5f ]
Dmitry posted a nice reproducer of a bug triggering in neigh_probe()
when dereferencing a NULL neigh->ops->solicit method.
This can happen for arp_direct_ops/ndisc_direct_ops and similar,
which can be used for NUD_NOARP neighbours (created when dev->header_ops
is NULL). Admin can then force changing nud_state to some other state
that would fire neigh timer.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/core/neighbour.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -859,7 +859,8 @@ static void neigh_probe(struct neighbour
if (skb)
skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
write_unlock(&neigh->lock);
- neigh->ops->solicit(neigh, skb);
+ if (neigh->ops->solicit)
+ neigh->ops->solicit(neigh, skb);
atomic_inc(&neigh->probes);
kfree_skb(skb);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists