lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 14:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [patch v2] mm, vmscan: avoid thrashing anon lru when free + file is
 low

The purpose of the code that commit 623762517e23 ("revert 'mm: vmscan: do
not swap anon pages just because free+file is low'") reintroduces is to
prefer swapping anonymous memory rather than trashing the file lru.

If the anonymous inactive lru for the set of eligible zones is considered
low, however, or the length of the list for the given reclaim priority
does not allow for effective anonymous-only reclaiming, then avoid
forcing SCAN_ANON.  Forcing SCAN_ANON will end up thrashing the small
list and leave unreclaimed memory on the file lrus.

If the inactive list is insufficient, fallback to balanced reclaim so the
file lru doesn't remain untouched.

Suggested-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
 to akpm: this issue has been possible since at least 3.15, so it's
 probably not high priority for 4.12 but applies cleanly if it can sneak
 in

 mm/vmscan.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2204,8 +2204,17 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		}
 
 		if (unlikely(pgdatfile + pgdatfree <= total_high_wmark)) {
-			scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
-			goto out;
+			/*
+			 * Force SCAN_ANON if there are enough inactive
+			 * anonymous pages on the LRU in eligible zones.
+			 * Otherwise, the small LRU gets thrashed.
+			 */
+			if (!inactive_list_is_low(lruvec, false, sc, false) &&
+			    lruvec_lru_size(lruvec, LRU_INACTIVE_ANON, sc->reclaim_idx)
+					>> sc->priority) {
+				scan_balance = SCAN_ANON;
+				goto out;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ