[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170501212731.260444878@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:34:25 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.10 12/62] net/packet: fix overflow in check for tp_frame_nr
4.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
[ Upstream commit 8f8d28e4d6d815a391285e121c3a53a0b6cb9e7b ]
When calculating rb->frames_per_block * req->tp_block_nr the result
can overflow.
Add a check that tp_block_size * tp_block_nr <= UINT_MAX.
Since frames_per_block <= tp_block_size, the expression would
never overflow.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -4189,6 +4189,8 @@ static int packet_set_ring(struct sock *
rb->frames_per_block = req->tp_block_size / req->tp_frame_size;
if (unlikely(rb->frames_per_block == 0))
goto out;
+ if (unlikely(req->tp_block_size > UINT_MAX / req->tp_block_nr))
+ goto out;
if (unlikely((rb->frames_per_block * req->tp_block_nr) !=
req->tp_frame_nr))
goto out;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists