[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1705011436480.137835@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
cc: kirill@...temov.name, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/numa_emulation: assign physnode_mask directly
from numa_nodes_parsed
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 05:26:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> >On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Wei Yang wrote:
> >
> >> According to current code path, numa_nodes_parsed is already setup when
> >> numa_emucation() is called.
> >>
> >> x86_numa_init()
> >> numa_init()
> >> init_func()
> >>
> >> numa_emulation()
> >>
> >> numa_register_memblks()
> >>
> >
> >s/numa_emucation/numa_emulation/, but I think everything above should just
> >be reworded to say the following since it establishes the dependency:
> >
> >numa_init() has already called init_func(), which is responsible for
> >setting numa_nodes_parsed, so use this nodemask instead of re-finding it
> >when calling numa_emulation().
> >
>
> Yep, thanks.
>
> Looks your change log is better :-)
>
Thanks! Would it be possible to refresh the series and repost for the x86
maintainers?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists