[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493621047.32195.4.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 14:44:07 +0800
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/30] pinctrl: mediatek: reuse pinctrl driver for
mt7623
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 10:01 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:25 AM, <sean.wang@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> >
> > mt7623 pinctrl driver can be compatible with mt2701 one,
> > so the patch reuses the driver and deletes those redundant
> > ones.
> >
> > Cc: John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
>
> Partly correct.
>
> > "mediatek,mt6397-pinctrl", compatible with mt6397 pinctrl.
> > - "mediatek,mt7623-pinctrl", compatible with mt7623 pinctrl.
>
> NO don't do this.
>
> "compatible" means exactly this: this hardware is compatible with
> this driver. That is why we have it!
>
> So instead of mt7623 pretending to be mt2701, let the mt2701 driver
> list that it is compatible with mt7623, simple.
>
> So patch pinctrl-mt2701.c mt2701_pctrl_match[] instead.
>
Hi Linus,
really appreciate your clear guidance and reviewing on this
I will fix it up in the next version
Sean
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists