[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16988.1493604328@jrobl>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 11:05:28 +0900
From: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05g@...il.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk,
daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, jani.nikula@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Q. drm/i915 shrinker, synchronize_rcu_expedited() from handlers
Thanx for the reply.
Andrea Arcangeli:
> Yes I already reported this, my original fix was way more efficient
> (and also safer considering the above) than what landed upstream. My
> feedback was ignored though.
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2017-April/125414.html
I see.
Actually on my test system for v4.11-rc8, kthreadd, kworker, kswapd and
others all stopped working due to the synchronize_rcu_expedited call
from i915_gem_shrinker_count. It is definitly a show stopper for me as
an i915 user.
It was a few weeks ago when you posted. It is a pity the fix was not
merged before v4.11 comes out. I know v4.11 will appear soon. So I'd ask
i915 developers, would you test Andrea Arcangeli's fix and release it as
v4.11.1 as soon as possible?
J. R. Okajima
Powered by blists - more mailing lists