linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59070AD5.7030405@mentor.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 May 2017 03:15:49 -0700
From:   Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel@...bosch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: imx: dynamic burst length adjust for PIO mode

Hello Mark

Sorry, somehow I missed your following comment

On 02/14/2017 10:20 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 03:20:27PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
>
> This looks basically fine, a couple of fairly minor things here:
>
>> +	for (i = 0; i<  transfer->len / 4; i++) {
>> +		u8 temp;
>> +
>> +		temp = *(buf + i * 4);
>> +		*(buf + i * 4) = *(buf + i * 4 + 3);
>> +		*(buf + i * 4 + 3) = temp;
> Should this be using one of the cpu_to_ functions?  It's a bit unclear
> what the goal is here and if it'll work if the kernel is big endian
> (which people do do with i.MX systems IIRC).
indeed, with big endian kernel, this function won't work
I will replace the algo here with cpu_to_* in next version

Thanks,
Jiada

>> +	if (spi_imx->bpw_w == 1)
>> +		spi_imx_buf_rx_u8(spi_imx);
>> +	else if (spi_imx->bpw_w == 2)
>> +		spi_imx_buf_rx_u16(spi_imx);
> switch statement please.
>
>> +	if (spi_imx->dynamic_burst) {
>> +		spi_imx->count_index =
>> +				spi_imx->count>  MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MAX_BURST ?
>> +				spi_imx->count % MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_MAX_BURST :
>> +				spi_imx->count % sizeof(u32);
> Just write a normal if statement please, it's easier to read.