linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 May 2017 10:46:58 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
Cc:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove support for AVR32 architecture

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
<egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote:
> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:35:56 +0200 or thereabout, Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Mon 27 Mar 2017 15:26:04 +0200 or thereabout, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:44:26 +0100 Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no> wrote:
>
> <snipp AVR32 removal discussion>
>
>>> Is this still planned for 4.12?
>>
>> Yes, I have received no objections, only feedback to bits and pieces in
>> generic areas that can be removed in addition to my initial patch.
>
> Linus has merged the branch removing AVR32 architecture now.

Thanks!

Question: does it make sense / needed to Cc you on patches that are
going to remove AVR32 (related) bits in individual drivers? I suppose
I will do Cc you.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko