[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493687363.31102.21.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 21:09:23 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
lvenanci@...hat.com
Cc: lwang@...hat.com, efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] sched/topology: Remove FORCE_SD_OVERLAP
On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 15:20 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Its an obsolete debug mechanism and future code wants to rely on
> properties this undermines.
>
> Namely, it would be good to assume that SD_OVERLAP domains have
> children, but if we build the entire hierarchy with SD_OVERLAP this
> is
> obviously false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists