[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170502115944.GC6485@nazgul.tnic>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 13:59:44 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86_64: inline copy_page() at call site
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:49:04PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> It says unambiguously which instruction does the actual copying.
And that doesn't tell me that it is an unrolled moving using registers.
And that is much more useful info when I look at stack traces than just
"mov".
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists