[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec980cd2-f595-3ed5-5276-4d687480e621@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 10:11:14 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: distinguish between inliners in the same
function
SNIP
> ~~~~~
> $ perf report --stdio --inline --no-children
> Failed to open [ext4], continuing without symbols
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only
> options.
> #
> #
> # Total Lost Samples: 0
> #
> # Samples: 499 of event 'cycles'
> # Event count (approx.): 329354953
> #
> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ......... ................. ................................
> #
> 96.70% ex_random ex_random [.] main
> |
> ---main
> __libc_start_main
> _start
> ...
> ~~~~~
>
> Note how no inlined frames are actually shown, because the first
> sample in main points to an IP that does not correspond to any
> inlined frames.
perf report -g address --inline --stdio
Did you try with "-g address" option? It's sorted by address.
But anyway, I like this patch. It works well in my test.
Thanks
Jin Yao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists