[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <149374507992.8805.9670925184482786336.stgit@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:11:52 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: <serge@...lyn.com>, <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <agruenba@...hat.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <oleg@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...l-moore.com>,
<ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
<avagin@...nvz.org>, <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
<mtk.manpages@...il.com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<luto@...capital.net>, <mingo@...nel.org>, <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] security: Use user_namespace::level to avoid redundant
iterations in cap_capable()
When ns->level is not larger then cred->user_ns->level,
then ns can't be cred->user_ns's descendant, and
there is no a sence to search in parents.
So, breake the cycle earlier and skip needless iterations.
v2: Change comment on suggested by Andy Lutomirski.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
---
security/commoncap.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
index 78b37838a2d3..a424aa0123af 100644
--- a/security/commoncap.c
+++ b/security/commoncap.c
@@ -82,8 +82,11 @@ int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *targ_ns,
if (ns == cred->user_ns)
return cap_raised(cred->cap_effective, cap) ? 0 : -EPERM;
- /* Have we tried all of the parent namespaces? */
- if (ns == &init_user_ns)
+ /*
+ * If we're already at a lower level than we're looking for, we're
+ * done searching.
+ */
+ if (ns->level <= cred->user_ns->level)
return -EPERM;
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists