[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1493750832-11981-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 14:47:08 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] ima: builtin policy requiring file signatures
The builtin "ima_appraise_tcb" policy should require file signatures
for at least a few of the hooks (eg. kernel modules, firmware, kexec
kernel image, and the IMA policy), but changing it would break the
existing userspace/kernel ABI.
This patch set extends the "ima_policy=" boot command line option to
support specifying multiple builtin policies, introduces a new builtin
policy named "secure_boot" to require file signatures, defines a new
Kconfig option to permit specifying "log" and "fix" modes as options on
the "ima_appraise=" boot command line, and defines is_ima_appraise_enabled().
These changes provide some of the missing functionality needed for the
"locked-down" patch set to detect whether file signatures are being
validated.
Mimi
Mimi Zohar (4):
ima: extend the "ima_policy" boot command line to support multiple
policies
ima: define a set of appraisal rules requiring file signatures
ima: define Kconfig IMA_APPRAISE_BOOTPARAM option
ima: define is_ima_appraise_enabled()
Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 21 +++++++++----
include/linux/ima.h | 6 ++++
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 8 +++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 12 ++++++++
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++----
5 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists