[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8760hjq6by.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 07:47:29 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] blk: replace bioset_create_nobvec() with a flags arg to bioset_create()
On Tue, May 02 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bio.h b/include/linux/bio.h
>> index d1b04b0e99cf..0975da6bebd9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bio.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bio.h
>> @@ -373,8 +373,10 @@ static inline struct bio *bio_next_split(struct bio *bio, int sectors,
>> return bio_split(bio, sectors, gfp, bs);
>> }
>>
>> -extern struct bio_set *bioset_create(unsigned int, unsigned int);
>> -extern struct bio_set *bioset_create_nobvec(unsigned int, unsigned int);
>> +extern struct bio_set *bioset_create(unsigned int, unsigned int, int flags);
>> +enum {
>> + BIOSET_NEED_BVECS = BIT(0),
>> +};
>
> I really hate the BIT macro as it obsfucates what's going on.
So post a patch to remove it from the tree.
I happen to like it, but I wouldn't fight for it.
>
> Why not just
>
> BIOSET_NEED_BVECS = (1 << 0),
>
> which is a lot more intuitive.
>
> Otherwise looks fine to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Thanks,
NeilBrown
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists