lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170503081425.3b4199b5@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2017 08:14:25 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
        HÃ¥vard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with Linus' tree

Hi Masahiro,

Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in:

  arch/avr32/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild

between commit:

  26202873bb51 ("avr32: remove support for AVR32 architecture")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  65017bab8a9e ("uapi: export all headers under uapi directories")

from the kbuild tree.

I fixed it up (I removed the file) and can carry the fix as necessary.
This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ