[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170503105224.19049-8-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 18:52:24 +0800
From: guangrong.xiao@...il.com
To: pbonzini@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, avi.kivity@...il.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@...gnu.org, Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: stop using mmu_spte_get_lockless under mmu-lock
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
mmu_spte_age() is under the protection of mmu-lock, no reason to use
mmu_spte_get_lockless()
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...cent.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index f6a74e7..a8b91ee 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static u64 restore_acc_track_spte(u64 spte)
/* Returns the Accessed status of the PTE and resets it at the same time. */
static bool mmu_spte_age(u64 *sptep)
{
- u64 spte = mmu_spte_get_lockless(sptep);
+ u64 spte = *sptep;
if (!is_accessed_spte(spte))
return false;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists