linux-kernel - Re: x86: warning: kernel stack regs has bad 'bp' value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170503133006.7jv4qhnnbsv7ueam@treble>
Date:   Wed, 3 May 2017 08:30:06 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: x86: warning: kernel stack regs has bad 'bp' value

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've got the following error report while fuzzing the kernel with syzkaller.
> 
> On commit 89c9fea3c8034cdb2fd745f551cde0b507fd6893 (4.11.0+).
> 
> A reproducer and .config are attached.
> 
> The reproducer open SCTP sockets and sends data to it in a loop.
> I'm not sure whether this is an issue with SCTP or with something else.
> 
> WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffff8800686869f8 in a.out:4933 has bad
> 'bp' value c3fc855a10167ec0

Hi Andrey,

Can you test this patch?


diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.S b/arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.S
index 7e48807..45a53df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.S
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	movq  %r12, 3*8(%rsp)
 	movq  %r14, 4*8(%rsp)
 	movq  %r13, 5*8(%rsp)
-	movq  %rbp, 6*8(%rsp)
+	movq  %r15, 6*8(%rsp)
 
 	movq  %r8, (%rsp)
 	movq  %r9, 1*8(%rsp)
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	/* main loop. clear in 64 byte blocks */
 	/* r9: zero, r8: temp2, rbx: temp1, rax: sum, rcx: saved length */
 	/* r11:	temp3, rdx: temp4, r12 loopcnt */
-	/* r10:	temp5, rbp: temp6, r14 temp7, r13 temp8 */
+	/* r10:	temp5, r15: temp6, r14 temp7, r13 temp8 */
 	.p2align 4
 .Lloop:
 	source
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	source
 	movq  32(%rdi), %r10
 	source
-	movq  40(%rdi), %rbp
+	movq  40(%rdi), %r15
 	source
 	movq  48(%rdi), %r14
 	source
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	adcq  %r11, %rax
 	adcq  %rdx, %rax
 	adcq  %r10, %rax
-	adcq  %rbp, %rax
+	adcq  %r15, %rax
 	adcq  %r14, %rax
 	adcq  %r13, %rax
 
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	dest
 	movq %r10, 32(%rsi)
 	dest
-	movq %rbp, 40(%rsi)
+	movq %r15, 40(%rsi)
 	dest
 	movq %r14, 48(%rsi)
 	dest
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ ENTRY(csum_partial_copy_generic)
 	movq 3*8(%rsp), %r12
 	movq 4*8(%rsp), %r14
 	movq 5*8(%rsp), %r13
-	movq 6*8(%rsp), %rbp
+	movq 6*8(%rsp), %r15
 	addq $7*8, %rsp
 	ret