[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc1TJ4W8m3TBGYq9FEQ5uM80jR4j2qRA6Oz6MRN3ErTsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 17:43:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the
watchdog tree
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:58:22PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> > On a side note, it appears that I tagged "watchdog: iTCO_wdt: cleanup
>> > set/unset no_reboot_bit functions" with "Reviewed-by:", not with "Acked-by:".
>>
>> I noticed this as well. If Wim drops these, we'll correct that in our branch.
>
> It makes sence to keep the patches together. I will drop the patches from the watchdog tree.
Thanks, Wim.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists