[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170503151553.AC3FE3FB6C@swsrvapps-01.diasemi.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 16:15:53 +0100
From: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
CC: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@...amocchi.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: da7213: Fix incorrect usage of bitwise '&' operator for
SRM check
In the SRM lock check section of code the '&' bitwise operator is
used as part of checking lock status. Functionally the code works
as intended, but the conditional statement is a boolean comparison
so should really use '&&' logical operator instead. This commit
rectifies this discrepancy.
Signed-off-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
---
sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
index 12da558..d114f33 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/da7213.c
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ static int da7213_dai_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
++i;
msleep(50);
}
- } while ((i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES) & (!srm_lock));
+ } while ((i < DA7213_SRM_CHECK_RETRIES) && (!srm_lock));
if (!srm_lock)
dev_warn(codec->dev, "SRM failed to lock\n");
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists