[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493840651.22125.24.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 12:44:11 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix __show_regs output timestamps
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 20:23 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:39:49AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Multiple line formats are not preferred as the second and
> > subsequent lines may not have timestamps.
> >
> > Lacking timestamps makes reading the output a bit difficult.
> > This also makes arm/arm64 output more similar.
> >
> > Previous:
> >
> > [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>] lr : [<bf79ced8>] psr: a00f0013
> > sp : ecdd7e20 ip : 00000000 fp : ffffffff
> >
> > New:
> >
> > [ 1514.093231] pc : [<bf79c304>] lr : [<bf79ced8>] psr: a00f0013
> > [ 1514.105316] sp : ecdd7e20 ip : 00000000 fp : ffffffff
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Could you put this in my patch system please, I'm unlikely to remember to
> apply it otherwise if not already there (massive email backlog.)
>
> Thanks.
Your patch system bounced my perfectly formatted patch
because your system wants totally unnecessary additional
information specific to your workflow.
No thanks, I don't need the additional work just to
please your system and neither should anyone else.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists