[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504080931.GA1487@katana>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 10:09:31 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] mfd: Add OF device table to I2C drivers that are
missing it
Javier,
thanks for the series.
> Most patches can be applied independently, with the exception of patches
> 2 to 4 that should be applied in the same tree to keep bisect-ability. I
> suggest these to go through the MFD subsystem tree.
From my POV, patches 2-5 should be applied to the same tree. Since all
I2C related patches have my tag, I assume they will be picked up by MFD.
Lee, let me know if you prefer differently.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists