[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504102114.GC5417@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 11:21:15 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add arm@...nel.org as the list for arm64
defconfig changes
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 05/03/2017 12:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > No, I'm not saying that, and there is a better way: Send it through
> > Andy if in doubt -- it should be his job as your platform maintainer
> > to help guide you through the system if needed.
>
> Will told me that defconfig patches should go to arm@...nel.org, but you're
> telling me they should go to Andy instead.
defconfig patches go via arm@...nel.org, because they pick them up from the
platform maintainers. However, given that the merge window is open (and my
understanding is that you want these in for 4.12!), I suggested mailing them
directly to arm@...nel.org to get their opinion, which they promptly provided ;)
Apologies for the confusion,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists