[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <823fcdcf-893e-edc7-62c2-585db7f868ed@coly.li>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 21:59:41 +0800
From: Coly Li <i@...y.li>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, colyli@...e.de,
bcache@...ux.ewheeler.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcache: explicitly destory mutex while exiting
On 2017/5/2 下午4:09, Liang Chen wrote:
> mutex_destroy does nothing most of time, but it's better to call
> it to make the code future proof and it also has some meaning
> for like mutex debug.
>
Hi Liang,
Could you please explain a little bit more about how mutex_destroy()
helps to future proof of the code, and how it helps to mutex debug ?
Forgive me for not catching your point.
Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 85e3f21..406fe03 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -2083,6 +2083,7 @@ static void bcache_exit(void)
> if (bcache_major)
> unregister_blkdev(bcache_major, "bcache");
> unregister_reboot_notifier(&reboot);
> + mutex_destroy(&bch_register_lock);
> }
>
> static int __init bcache_init(void)
> @@ -2100,6 +2101,7 @@ static int __init bcache_init(void)
>
> bcache_major = register_blkdev(0, "bcache");
> if (bcache_major < 0) {
> + mutex_destroy(&bch_register_lock);
> unregister_reboot_notifier(&reboot);
> return bcache_major;
> }
>
--
Coly Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists