[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504144128.k2a5vxebtyly7qlv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 16:41:28 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/sched/core v2] sched/rt: Simplify the IPI rt
balancing logic
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:47:32AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> + /* Keep the loop going if the IPI is currently active */
> + atomic_inc_return(&rq->rd->rto_loop_next);
What's the return for?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists