[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170504142329.wanerqq5nsmu3blr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 16:23:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Xunlei Pang <xpang@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Romulo Silva de Oliveira <romulo.deoliveira@...c.br>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched/deadline: Use the revised wakeup rule for
suspending constrained dl tasks
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 04:17:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:18:35PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> > +static void
> > +update_dl_revised_wakeup(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq)
> > +{
> > + u64 density = div64_u64(dl_se->dl_runtime << 20, dl_se->dl_deadline);
> > + u64 laxity = dl_se->deadline - rq_clock(rq);
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(laxity < 0);
>
> Compiler will make that go away, by virtue of laxity being unsigned.
Also, so we want that to BUG (or even WARN) in a soft RT setting.
Remember, GEDF does not guarantee we make our deadlines.
> We use two difference CBS rules:
_different_, clearly I cannot type anymore either ;-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists