Date:   Fri, 5 May 2017 12:42:57 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Propagate runnable_load_avg independently
 from load_avg

On 4 May 2017 at 22:30, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> We noticed that with cgroup CPU controller in use, the scheduling
> latency gets wonky regardless of nesting level or weight
> configuration.  This is easily reproducible with Chris Mason's
> schbench[1].
>
> All tests are run on a single socket, 16 cores, 32 threads machine.
> While the machine is mostly idle, it isn't completey.  There's always
> some variable management load going on.  The command used is
>
>  schbench -m 2 -t 16 -s 10000 -c 15000 -r 30
>
> which measures scheduling latency with 32 threads each of which
> repeatedly runs for 15ms and then sleeps for 10ms.  Here's a
> representative result when running from the root cgroup.
>
>  # ~/schbench -m 2 -t 16 -s 10000 -c 15000 -r 30
>  Latency percentiles (usec)
>          50.0000th: 26
>          75.0000th: 62
>          90.0000th: 74
>          95.0000th: 86
>          *99.0000th: 887
>          99.5000th: 3692
>          99.9000th: 10832
>          min=0, max=13374
>
> The following is inside a first level CPU cgroup with the maximum
> weight.
>
>  # ~/schbench -m 2 -t 16 -s 10000 -c 15000 -r 30
>  Latency percentiles (usec)
>          50.0000th: 31
>          75.0000th: 65
>          90.0000th: 71
>          95.0000th: 91
>          *99.0000th: 7288
>          99.5000th: 10352
>          99.9000th: 12496
>          min=0, max=13023
>
> Note the drastic increase in p99 scheduling latency.  After
> investigation, it turned out that the update_sd_lb_stats(), which is
> used by load_balance() to pick the most loaded group, was often
> picking the wrong group.  A CPU which has one schbench running and
> another queued wouldn't report the correspondingly higher
> weighted_cpuload() and get looked over as the target of load
> balancing.
>
> weighted_cpuload() is the root cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg which is the
> sum of the load_avg of all active sched_entities.  Without cgroups or
> at the root cgroup, each task's load_avg contributes directly to the
> sum.  When a task wakes up or goes to sleep, the change is immediately
> reflected on runnable_load_avg which in turn affects load balancing.
>
> However, when CPU cgroup is in use, a nested cfs_rq blocks this
> immediate propagation.  When a task wakes up inside a cgroup, the
> nested cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg is updated but doesn't get
> propagated to the parent.  It only affects the matching sched_entity's
> load_avg over time which then gets propagated to the runnable_load_avg
> at that level.  This makes the runnable_load_avg at the root queue
> incorrectly include blocked load_avgs of tasks queued in nested
> cfs_rqs causing the load balancer to make the wrong choices.
>
> This patch fixes the bug by propagating nested cfs_rq's
> runnable_load_avg independently from load_avg.  Tasks still contribute
> to its cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg the same way; however, a nested
> cfs_rq directly propagates the scaled runnable_load_avg to the
> matching group sched_entity's avg.runnable_load_avg and keeps the se's
> and parent cfs_rq's runnable_load_avg in sync.
>
> This ensures that, for any given cfs_rq, its runnable_load_avg is the
> sum of the scaled load_avgs of all and only active tasks queued on it
> and its descendants.  This allows the load balancer to operate on the
> same information whether there are nested cfs_rqs or not.
>
> With the patch applied, the p99 latency from inside a cgroup is
> equivalent to the root cgroup case.
>
>  # ~/schbench -m 2 -t 16 -s 10000 -c 15000 -r 30
>  Latency percentiles (usec)
>          50.0000th: 40
>          75.0000th: 71
>          90.0000th: 89
>          95.0000th: 108
>          *99.0000th: 679
>          99.5000th: 3500
>          99.9000th: 10960
>          min=0, max=13790
>
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/schbench.git
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3098,6 +3098,30 @@ update_tg_cfs_util(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq
>         cfs_rq->avg.util_sum = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>  }
>
> +static inline void
> +update_tg_cfs_runnable(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> +{
> +       struct cfs_rq *gcfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se);
> +       long load, delta;
> +
> +       load = scale_load_down(calc_cfs_shares(gcfs_rq, gcfs_rq->tg,
> +                                              shares_runnable));
> +       delta = load - se->avg.runnable_load_avg;
> +
> +       /* Nothing to update */
> +       if (!delta)
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* Set new sched_entity's load */
> +       se->avg.runnable_load_avg = load;
> +       se->avg.runnable_load_sum = se->avg.runnable_load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
> +
> +       /* Update parent cfs_rq load */
> +       add_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg, delta);
> +       cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum =
> +               cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
> +}
> +
>  /* Take into account change of load of a child task group */
>  static inline void
>  update_tg_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
> @@ -3120,17 +3144,6 @@ update_tg_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq
>         /* Update parent cfs_rq load */
>         add_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, delta);
>         cfs_rq->avg.load_sum = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * If the sched_entity is already enqueued, we also have to update the
> -        * runnable load avg.
> -        */
> -       if (se->on_rq) {
> -               /* Update parent cfs_rq runnable_load_avg */
> -               add_positive(&cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg, delta);
> -               cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum =
> -                       cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
> -       }
>  }
>
>  static inline void set_tg_cfs_propagate(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> @@ -3152,16 +3165,16 @@ static inline int test_and_clear_tg_cfs_
>  /* Update task and its cfs_rq load average */
>  static inline int propagate_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
>  {
> -       struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> +       struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>
>         if (entity_is_task(se))
>                 return 0;
>
> +       update_tg_cfs_runnable(cfs_rq, se);
> +
>         if (!test_and_clear_tg_cfs_propagate(se))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> -
>         set_tg_cfs_propagate(cfs_rq);
>
>         update_tg_cfs_util(cfs_rq, se);
> @@ -3298,7 +3311,7 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struc
>         if (se->avg.last_update_time && !(flags & SKIP_AGE_LOAD)) {
>                 __update_load_avg(now, cpu, &se->avg,
>                           se->on_rq * scale_load_down(se->load.weight),
> -                         cfs_rq->curr == se, false);
> +                         cfs_rq->curr == se, !entity_is_task(se));
>         }
>
>         decayed  = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(now, cfs_rq, true);
> @@ -3354,8 +3367,10 @@ enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *c
>  {
>         struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
>
> -       cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg += sa->load_avg;
> -       cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum += sa->load_sum;
> +       if (entity_is_task(se)) {

Why don't you add the runnable_load_avg of a group_entity that is enqueued ?

> +               cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg += sa->load_avg;
> +               cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum += sa->load_sum;
> +       }
>
>         if (!sa->last_update_time) {
>                 attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
> @@ -3369,6 +3384,9 @@ dequeue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *c
>  {
>         struct sched_avg *sa = &se->avg;
>
> +       if (!entity_is_task(se))
> +               return;

Same as enqueue, you have to remove the runnable_load_avg of a
group_entity that is dequeued

> +
>         cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg =
>                 max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_avg - sa->load_avg, 0);
>         cfs_rq->avg.runnable_load_sum =
> @@ -3406,7 +3424,8 @@ void sync_entity_load_avg(struct sched_e
>         u64 last_update_time;
>
>         last_update_time = cfs_rq_last_update_time(cfs_rq);
> -       __update_load_avg(last_update_time, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)), &se->avg, 0, 0, false);
> +       __update_load_avg(last_update_time, cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq)),
> +                         &se->avg, 0, 0, !entity_is_task(se));
>  }
>
>  /*

Powered by blists - more mailing lists