[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 13:46:26 +0200
From: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...labora.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sd: Ignore sync cache failures when not supported
On 05/05/2017 11:02, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Normally we'd just pass the scsi_sense_hdr structure in from the
> caler if we care about sense data. Is this something you considered?
Not really as only the sense_key field is needed for only one call to
sd_sync_cache() (out of two).
>
> Otherwise this looks fine to me.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists