[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170505022141.GA418@tigerII.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 11:21:41 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] printk: Use the main logbuf in NMI when logbuf_lock
is available
On (05/04/17 17:46), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> Suggested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
a small nitpick,
[..]
> void printk_nmi_enter(void)
> {
> - this_cpu_or(printk_context, PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK);
> + /*
> + * The size of the extra per-CPU buffer is limited. Use it only when
> + * the main one is locked. If this CPU is not in the safe context,
> + * the lock must be taken on another CPU and we could wait for it.
> + */
> + if (raw_spin_is_locked(&logbuf_lock) &&
> + this_cpu_read(printk_context) & PRINTK_SAFE_CONTEXT_MASK) {
> + this_cpu_or(printk_context, PRINTK_NMI_CONTEXT_MASK);
could we please check `printk_context' (local to a particular CPU)
first and, if positive, then access `logbuf_lock' (which is global)?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists