linux-kernel - Re: GPU-DRM-STI: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 May 2017 17:04:40 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>,
        Vincent Abriou <vincent.abriou@...com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-STI: Fine-tuning for some function implementations

> It seems like you're back to submitting cocci patches again :)

My contribution activities are varying also for Linux software over time.   ;-)

The corresponding source code search patterns get different popularity.


> I don't want to waste your time by ignoring your patches, so please ensure that
> your patches provide value and that they are tested.

Which benchmarks and system tests would you find representative for this patch series?

How do you think generally about the proposed change possibilities?

Regards,
Markus