[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 19:39:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/sched/core v2] sched/rt: Simplify the IPI rt
balancing logic
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:02:38AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Actually what rteval does is basically 3 things. It runs cyclictest,
> hackbench in a loop and a kernel build in a loop.
Of those, only cyclictest uses RT tasks and would end up poking at the
bits you just changed.
So just running cyclictest should lock up a ~120 CPU machine?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists