[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdYqK4QnncCHeiTWqaERtzJeLO+MWTEMXL9hbqaEX0USg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 17:23:06 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@...t42.net>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] fujitsu-laptop: use device-specific data instead of
module-wide globals
On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
>
>> To be fair, one thing that may be "unnatural" with this approach is that
>> even though fujitsu-backlight would depend on fujitsu-laptop, it would
>> still have to get a handle to FUJ02E3 using:
>>
>> acpi_get_handle(NULL, "\\_SB.FEXT", ...)
>>
>> because call_fext_func() - and thus fext_backlight() - needs to be
>> passed a handle to FUJ02E3 and the two ACPI devices (FUJ02B1 handled by
>> fujitsu-backlight and FUJ02E3 handled by fujitsu-laptop) are not related
>> from the perspective of the ACPI device hierarchy. Unless there is a
>> better way of implementing this, in which case I am open to suggestions.
>
> There are two areas to check with:
> 1. Remote graph node
> https://lwn.net/Articles/718184/
> 2. Component framework (only works in case when all devices are
> mandatory to have).
Ah, and third one is MFD framework.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists