[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170506221355.13552-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date:   Sat,  6 May 2017 23:13:55 +0100
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
        Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@...adcom.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: ensure els_wq is being checked before destroying it
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
I believe there is a typo on the wq destroy of els_wq, currently
the driver is checking if els_cq is not null and I think this
should be a check on els_wq instead.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1411629 ("Copy-paste error")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 90ae354a9c45..c925bbe9b35d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -8847,7 +8847,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_queue_unset(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 		lpfc_wq_destroy(phba, phba->sli4_hba.nvmels_wq);
 
 	/* Unset ELS work queue */
-	if (phba->sli4_hba.els_cq)
+	if (phba->sli4_hba.els_wq)
 		lpfc_wq_destroy(phba, phba->sli4_hba.els_wq);
 
 	/* Unset unsolicited receive queue */
-- 
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
