linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] liblockdep for 4.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 7 May 2017 23:04:31 +0000
From:   alexander.levin@...izon.com
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:     "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "ben@...adent.org.uk" <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] liblockdep for 4.12

On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 08:11:38AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * alexander.levin@...izon.com <alexander.levin@...izon.com> wrote:
> Could you please include all the patches as part of the pull request, so that 
> individual patches can be discussed?

Sure, I'll resend.
 
> In particular I'm wondering about:
> 
> >  tools/include/linux/jhash.h                    | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> include/linux/jhash.h is 175 lines long - why not make an exact copy and keep it 
> synchronized the way perf does it?

Including jhash() vs only jhash2() required pulling additional headers in.
Since we don't need jhash() I preferred to drop it.

Let me know if you'd prefer to do it the other way and include everything.

-- 

Thanks,
Sasha