lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun,  7 May 2017 10:59:40 +0200
From:   Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
To:     Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
Cc:     Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@...us.com>,
        linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
Subject: [PATCH RFC V2] fpga: socfpga: handle interrupted case as non-success

 wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() can return 0 (timeout)
or -ERESTARTSYS when interrupted - the current code treats the
interrupted case as success which is wrong and could lead to hard
to reproduce errors. Fix this by returning non-0 in both cases
to the calling side. This also changes the timeout variable to the
proper type as wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() returns
long not int.

Fixes: commit fab6266e82a8 ("fpga manager: add driver for socfpga fpga manager")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>
---

V2: the patch was not yet compile tested as I wanted to clarify the
    below issue first - but it got picked up by kbuild-test anyway
    so here is a compile-tested (and fixed) version - but the key
    issue still is to clarify if the use of the interruptible version
    actually makes sense here at all - I think it should be dropped.

It is not really clear to me why the _interruptible_ version of 
wait_for_completion is in use here - so maybe the proper mitigation
is to simply change the call to wait_for_completion_timeout() and
drop the interrupted case all together as the timeout of 10ms is 
not that long that waiting for timeout would be problematic. Someone
that knows the intent of selecting the _interruptible_ call would
need to check if this is a more reasonable solution.

Patch was compile tested with: socfpga_defconfig (implies CONFIG_FPGA_MGR_SOCFPGA)

Patch is against v4.11 (localversion-next is next-20170505)

 drivers/fpga/socfpga.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
index b6672e6..532abd6 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/socfpga.c
@@ -312,7 +312,8 @@ static irqreturn_t socfpga_fpga_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
 static int socfpga_fpga_wait_for_config_done(struct socfpga_fpga_priv *priv)
 {
-	int timeout, ret = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	long timeout;
 
 	socfpga_fpga_disable_irqs(priv);
 	init_completion(&priv->status_complete);
@@ -323,6 +324,8 @@ static int socfpga_fpga_wait_for_config_done(struct socfpga_fpga_priv *priv)
 						msecs_to_jiffies(10));
 	if (timeout == 0)
 		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	else if (timeout == -ERESTARTSYS)
+		ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
 
 	socfpga_fpga_disable_irqs(priv);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists