linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 2/2] mux: mmio-based syscon mux controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 May 2017 10:12:24 +0200
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/2] mux: mmio-based syscon mux controller

Hi Peter,

On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 10:00 +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> With the ack on the bindings in place, I'm going to pile these
> two patches on top of my mux series when I send v15 next week (or
> whenever v4.12-rc1 is out). There are a pair of nitpicks that I'm
> going to fix myself, so no need for a resend.

Yes, please. While at it, could you also fix my "bitfieldis" typo in the
commit description of patch 1.

> Thank you very much for making use of the new code, I hope the
> "3rd party interest" will help getting the mux series merged...

Thanks to Sakari for pointing it out in the video-mux review.

regards
Philipp