linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: max8997/8966: fix charger cv voltage set bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 08 May 2017 11:14:06 +0200
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: max8997/8966: fix charger cv voltage set bug

On Monday, May 08, 2017 05:45:44 AM MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> 
> When min charger-CV is <= 4.0V and max charger-CV is >= 4.0V,
> we can use 4.00V as CV (register value = 0x1).`
> 
> The original code had a typo that wrote ">=" (max_uV >= 4000000),
> which should've been "<", which is not necessary anyway
> as mentioned by Dan Carpenter.
> 
> Reported-By: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>

Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics