linux-kernel - Re: Race to power off harming SATA SSDs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 8 May 2017 13:50:05 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@...s.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Subject: Re: Race to power off harming SATA SSDs

On Mon, 08 May 2017 11:13:10 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2017-05-08 at 11:09 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > You're forgetting that the SSD itself (this thread is about SSDs) also has
> > a major software component which is doing housekeeping all the time, so even
> > if the main CPU gets reset the SSD's controller may still happily be erasing
> > blocks.  
> 
> We're not really talking about SSDs at all any more; we're talking
> about real flash with real maintainable software.

It's probably a good sign that this new discussion should take place in
a different thread :-).