[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb677bb2-ec20-c7a4-cd37-80f3f381981f@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 08:20:14 -0500
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/32] efi: Update efi_mem_type() to return an error
rather than 0
On 5/7/2017 12:18 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> The efi_mem_type() function currently returns a 0, which maps to
>> EFI_RESERVED_TYPE, if the function is unable to find a memmap entry for
>> the supplied physical address. Returning EFI_RESERVED_TYPE implies that
>> a memmap entry exists, when it doesn't. Instead of returning 0, change
>> the function to return a negative error value when no memmap entry is
>> found.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/efi.h b/include/linux/efi.h
>> index cd768a1..a27bb3f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/efi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/efi.h
>> @@ -973,7 +973,7 @@ static inline void efi_esrt_init(void) { }
>> extern int efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz,
>> efi_config_table_type_t *arch_tables);
>> extern u64 efi_get_iobase (void);
>> -extern u32 efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
>> +extern int efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
>
> WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #101: FILE: include/linux/efi.h:976:
> +extern int efi_mem_type (unsigned long phys_addr);
>
> Please integrate scripts/checkpatch.pl in your patch creation workflow.
> Some of the warnings/errors *actually* make sense.
I do/did run scripts/checkpatch.pl against all my patches. In this case
I chose to keep the space in order to stay consistent with some of the
surrounding functions. No problem though, I can remove the space.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> I know, the other function prototypes have a space too but that's not
> our coding style. Looks like this trickled in from ia64, from looking at
> arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists